i '1. FEBRUARY 11 193a ' ~ 1 l . a _ 1 PAGE NINE » ~ - ‘ m . ' I — “S"‘"“‘°““ 1“ P"'°"""“°° ‘l’ i-m-"i-ii- ﬂi- ' - "1- A cldtclilcilt is conditionally i ____ , _ , i ~ , SPECIALS . .. ...... .. A reason/u. SERVICE r 1 I ' . formancc of any legal or moral duty .‘ . ' Pivotal New ' L » 1mP°5Ed "Don the person making it i T g - Id meht at the defence “The heed e 1 be l e r -: rui company executor rervicc on Your n York (we mrdehtp then reed the eeete_ bmty ‘or em" elileﬁaﬁgngabheuofllylithe; behall and that oi your family is personal »lt e tnent 0f claim and statement 0f de- GRAPE FRUIT t|~,,,_.,,. ueruone “met without any just ; inasmuch as the individual attention of '° meek. (Canmllrln rm») N -,A l l e Biggie)“ e "teed ere ee ml pet. doze e _ _ e _ e I c euh m, occasion’ venture to etteeek many experts is given to the carrying out oi ; . Alum (element H lewe- . 11mm . FRESH EGGS the teuututton ot- ottlere. But where $ wishes expressed in your will. It, however. c Alll uni] It‘ Pnivo , ‘ d f t A , \ Q Aelllllxufellmtlilllllll hi’ ' The piciuiiirr claim is that at a (rvirsls) (I01, _, Gleefillltgllllillltitfu i: ,1: "'".“°""‘ ‘h’ imlwi" l" "l". '1 I‘ "°' ” .,- » 1 iuuutuuu‘ City Council meeting in Charlotte- -___-i____._ hebtht. - ' ' l "5"" 1° 11" ‘mum °1' 11'1"" 01 flit -1 i u’ Auburn .\i'u'i'crr".'..". ' town on the 13th of Julie last, on FRESH BACON 9.1“ m“ llbscilcc of “mm ' lildividvdl- '- " ll . et-uuuuue my the eleteeme application ‘or pee u the c . . . '1|le question is, what is the ~ _ e -—-—- ‘ ' ,_ ' a c .......- defend. Lvrvdt. , _ COPPGOISBG F01‘ EVGPY ntnssliontwvllut‘? "u" “vd1°°°'°“'“ ORANGES icccilflriuiiiyiliiligftiil‘: Th‘ EASTERN TRUST c‘mP'"Y A ° W e d n e S d a and , hum ureum; TQXti lldglllellt E11. men reeeely Zulu, gluelﬁelolreztjeéftgié (Sunkist) d o z. 312113500: Dire: the tiury. to Scolds Sllntleohhertuebtleeheen eteltnd OMSQgCLILABXJtSM eSt-llgn-htiild. \ t‘, lguhru-url.» rhui llud _, d hhs, f ' 1 1" 11¢ $115 llluvc sue 1 "r -~ 011 H. 1"- - "iifiéciiie u.‘ v ‘laghmlllllzg “'1;%5?";:; VEGETABLE a 3U“, ielx-ivlacdj, c‘ N‘ 8155511 "Mdnager, Charlottetown Branch. l ; ~ _ _._ o ‘ ' '. OW ll.¢.L'l "' ' ~- i‘- y llfooigga ..' F In in‘: thereby 111° Pmntlﬂ) recﬂvcd bOUP’ 3 tmb " cation to iiil‘,b,,,:,,‘,,c,l,1,:;:°" App‘ '33 . Int Harvester h blindness by shooting. himself ‘CHICKEN " u " ‘ t .i__. ,,,t Nuke, Da Case e i The members or borough coun- h-u h- ,,t __ n - ._ n Rosebank Farm, but he (the - c i- E Yciitr-rrliLklri uillrkct u... well nt- e1’ l’ (‘fl-ill- .. .. y Diaintif!) was not very blind the . HADDIE’ 2 ‘ms f,l,1,s,,?;;:e°1,h°'r pubs“ 1mm‘ m 15 rcbuiidd by evidence c! malice; M I N I A T . i tleetlltlliiiltvtllltiez; it“rﬁlaltttetjtllﬂttihelite ttulrl-itieetetlutwetclltne v night he ct-tme into my shop and PEAS, canons "Hal; eoesgic e ofuconlvnluéler“ CVidEtltIe merely equivocal, that. i5. U B! E .. ‘ . ,,,,u,,..,', mm. ,.i,,,,;ge Dypf u,“ or the i» u. The following judgment was given stoic a 241d lb. bag of flour and Tomatoemg tins G hone-st tlutt-hmentc tmothlgr l? e “11131111 ‘111115151-9111 W1111 111111108 or _ ‘ luieil-t-eetgieiriece-re we eeeeee ems uely-efllu! {inf by Chief Justice Mathicson in tile walked out with it", the defendant xii-i- ' home ° e" ‘m’ 11°11“ "dc"- “111 11° 1i°111111i1101iar<l1 R I FL E S H 0 0 T ' piltrtrd: e H ‘butch tfllrtleilde case of’ Savldant versus Day: meaning thereby that the plaintiff LOOKED HAM The reason for this privilege "bmilns the pfﬁwmption: iLt-here- 5 - , I nu ‘llc c "W ‘ . ,.f,',',',;‘,§°e u; ,-,,,,,,,, ,._,u, shot hinlself and also stole a bag per lb. . . . . . . .. . Lord Jusuee Lmeey Me eewe forc- only such evidence be offered, _-_ _ . Ilettui-e . t-uuuuhuu m THE SUPREME eourvr 0t‘ flour from the defendant where- thus. " 111° 1110180 511011101 dirwt illdsmcnt td c,“ W. e l i {ejtftsliume-ieil» _ ‘tlggguigtit-ttu-‘ce Leo SavidanL-Plaintiff by tho plaintiff lost the profits that Fresh Lamb, pork, Beer ' bc__cutcrcd for the defendant." ‘ ‘ “"3 ""11 TM "'"""°"'1‘“ 3 11" " . i? _"'_ “mum ha" “M1111”! 1° 111111 111' °P" Chicken and Blltlcl‘ "The reason r0,- hokhng my 0c- s°' l'°°' 111° Judge 511°111d 510D J- El- M001’! 92 98 190 1 £2153 heeuee xt-mieei i" - Roland L. Day-Defendant, crating aaid fruit and ice cream e eeeum eetvueeee 1e fee the common the case if there be no more than a. A. v. Splllctt .. 94 91 185 1 (‘nnklltgt Ahph-s [wvk 1c 0 D ‘ February 1st, 1933. stand, and was greatly injured in Phone In‘) convenience alld welfare of society 50mm“ o! evidence °l man“ 1° 80 W. Dlnnu 90 9G 183 t It It’; :'. . I ' ' ' ' " ulfutltufu 1*.“ - hunch-g... . rt‘ Gentiemen of the Jury. his character and reputation, and and it is obvious that no definite to the Jury- Blit it is difficult to J.S. McDonald .. 90 88 178 ' ' “only _iui- l... .. _ During your retirement a motion the plaintiff claims $5000. Y "he eeh he duh,“ M. to the um. 55y befilichalid 11111111 W111 11° 171M111‘ L A McDougali 85 88 173 1 - '_' 4| l x -. . . ‘ ‘ ' ' ‘ , l ‘ n|'t','t“'|-“e miutguftue eloerreeeikttuultltiert: 1:62;.‘ ‘Yemen made by Mr. Bentley. KC. for de- The defence states that tile de- _ ticular ththg that Comprises “wee 9d ﬂ-eilllffc 501111111311111111- 1110" 1711111 W. R. Seaman .. 82 89 171 1 Parsley uuuuueee u ee-M e ueeee Fee the fendant was discussed. The motion fondant never spoke any of the o B E s occasiolis which are privileged and a’ Scmuua’ "1 i111)’ Elven case. It is E_ A Ferzuseu 90 8e no t. ' net.“ em, Peel", ueeuum Produce and dairy llillrkct ts that it be decreed by the Court words set out in the statement of _ separate them ttem these whteh ate ?m“£°' M15" 1°" 111° 1111139 1° 11°‘ Chas McKenzie. 93 6o 162 kt, Fee. Tue uextreneeelu ‘weather ﬂeet“ hat the words uttered by the ac- claim. 2. In the alternative, the Free Delivery “Qty "m e Whether 111C Occasion of w_ welsh _ _ _ _ __ 9, _ 9t {when .|‘.'i;l;\'l<i<-ii ihc rrtuucl. ‘for thtl!‘ uuzluru cused (which are the subject of defendant says that the said words The value of this statement isthat ‘mung °' 51101111111; crimlnatory T Re Thhe he _ 9e e uuxu,‘ uu “e! "tut" £1‘ “efmg”: this suit), were uttered on a. privil- are true in substance and in fact, ‘the tease“ tor holding any occasion 13118111130’ which W°111d Olhifflvi-W 11C H. Jehhesen 90 he l-- _ , __ l, .- ,_ . _ _____ - _ ..~ , . . . .... ‘“ . ‘mete _, {lﬁiﬂllee “ties ‘eeeutiﬂttlletl-leeeetelhlllce-célle‘Pat; egle: OCOBSeIOILe thlat thierc weasehne (u) (giﬁthe 24th Cltf March. 1931. the to Operate e restaurant m View“! uuhhueue is for the eemlnete eele itfllfelldblﬁ’. ruclzeeies the QHIOTCHCB of H H eteme _ us e8 ,;,“ " ‘ "1 ev ence a ’ ' ' ,1 _ ,. z c;consl l - ' ' ' _ Mm" Xtiznés. ifdrldl. ilgdwliiiecgrlilrlislapllltuelg the ease ghouciduathgiffof": ‘b; wit}: lieilmFranllcasilfmitlfzegwjilriglzgug: Park 511M115 119 Blamed. M1‘. Day ‘image and weumc of wclcw ll Privileged comlrllilglilgatlgnl-Saffgli? m“: “B, lrmii-i Luitib tfic ,'",,,,“‘,.,,‘;'§,';" a "°‘°"' n°°°11‘“ “N” drawn from the jury. occupied by him, in which painters 331d 09mm‘ things‘ I have mad m n0nqlltigtlglljlestell1tltlfraaffislitijgeicglllvllf m’ the Close o! the plaintiff's easel‘. w“? dent?“ n _ :1, ti] i ili- . .. . 14-‘ _'~_, __ _ - , _ H I . . - . __ v,_ ,.enns.,- I I ‘fete He grtlteteielllthulktelliltcéglltgfltzllgaggti; u; l Now, gentlemen, I know that you or workmen wcle at wolk. The ‘Se/cu what was charged he said. eeed eeeeeienyttleeneetineef “(my there is no intrinsic or CAtIIIISIC I “L _ 7e 7e lturrsr vcui 11'1- uuut ut eutt to 20,5 eeutu u ueuutt will not misunderstand any such plaintiff, without the permission or That the planmﬁ w“ not WW Council the deliberations of a City ewdence of malice‘ that it L‘ the l l c mm m ‘IA'i"‘_’e1;_1‘u§-'1_‘11_11 lteeireizllelteteaneiveltleeeel-‘We boxecsble I t motion as reﬂecting upon. the-jury authority of Leo Frank, opened a bmld the nlght he “me mm my Council, upon a matter affecting the duly 0t the judge to direct a “m” ,, ., .. . , ghoul: lrliyi-lr 16c um‘ uuuteu ut 1336,11,, ;:,,“u‘3h,fe'°§'§ or upon the confidence that the drawer of a bmeau in the house and Sh” and 51°16 a 24% pound bag or administration of the City Every Sum or a ‘verdict for me dclendanti cl”; A “b. G “m8 “m a i. s _ . - . .. - . - . ufuzuju uuuu e5: fellrpgzllettlfctlneleilltletlolz (to Court and the members of the Bar showed certain of tlic contents be- “m” “m! walked m" Wm‘ 11" I1" member o; that Board came wtthtu “1t11°111" leaving llic question or W‘ welsh ‘_ e, he we iipuuii Wonk 1-11 1,0,“, ' 1 s “- r” have in the jury; but in cases that longing to Leo Frank to the paint- Seems that “"9 1035011 1°‘ 113111118 the pt-tvtleges et- Speehhtewt Say man“? 1° 1119 111131" W Dhmh 93 9t 184 5“'1“1" “mm 9k vSiuiuc-u hchl uul-huugca New come before the Court such cases ers and the ‘ 1115 a °1111111°11t mild 11 l? 11 - I 11 V 1 ' ' ' _ , .l ,, , plgintlﬂ m- om o; 5mg Pl1_ e was _ia e in “u t ,_ _ _ _ _ a e come o the CODLlUSIOH ilrllnaitiek grew-n inoiiniilills Iii-lug - h d] t1} 1 ht _ g m w“ Ilecessary to bL bald t! ﬁt l l - h A' Mcnougan m B9 1w renew H we ueutted it 7;, “m, ueu e0 uuuuu bug. may be classified in two main divi- lminters, or workmen, without the D8 °5 155: M11111 evidently M11 u, the httemets et the City, even rm‘ hes 5 such a ca” and that 1t W, R. Seaman .. 90 88 11B Sh,“ _ Inquirer" eihrugdeelretuutle lirecceie slons, one relating to questions of authority of bee Frank took from “Y W115 1116B 118 $111111 by the Sldtc- though u; might involve the ehee vioud e of no vuluc to leave it to H) t, Home _ u; 79 u“ ruulthﬂeexe.‘ hue m", It uu tu he cents u" u“ fact and the other to questions of one of the drawers a small sun o;- lllent which involved two stute- uetervet. e mud person er eleyneee ygu. inasmuch as if vyour verdict he V. Setuete u m at use om, 1101""! 11118- law. Questions of fact, speaking tear gas bomb shaped like a foun- mentsi he W55 11°14 ""51 blmd W11" be, o; persons The oh] hhut u eh “we 311T" 7°‘ 111° 11181111111 it 0011111 _ . luriuilm ‘—“"""'“""“ broildly are for the decision of izlu- tain pen While the piaiiltiff and he ‘M19 111° b“! "f 1111111" "id 111 “he, thy mtght w), to ghe attetltuu. 11°“ 5131M‘ and W°111d 0111i‘ SPYYP to ch35 NLKenme ' 83 83 16? ' ' ‘ ‘ ‘ " ..-' ‘ 1‘ - . s- - . ‘ '1‘.‘R.."i"'. so at is . l-‘inll Mfr”! jury; questions of law are for the ivorknir-n were examining it, the :11“: 13F”?! Plllillc. that no received tu the“ mcelllin ueme be He“ “me eeeteug ill" lmgalw" and ‘"”°""‘“ F A tluﬁtitueuuu 74 7,, ,-,-.

" ' . ‘t5 c .1 t‘ ' . " _ ., nmhx. " ' '* - '“ - me ‘fee "e o decision of the Court. and each in said gun or bomb exploded. from R nubile: iy He nﬂ 111:1 himself was Se“, euoulehet be eeld mane!“ into is v I e J) S) element! e 9e e e em gjglpnu, w, its special field, the Court or the which cause the plaintiff's eyesight ‘m e 35° a“ Farm- 11 1» 111 95°01 Getty should hut he spoken with 1 u"? “1°1‘1°11 “111°11 118-5 119011 llliide H Jemieee u‘ u‘

me a - ' ’ 1 ll - . - - ‘m, Excuse‘ _ e (cenmtu, the", Jury. is practically supreme. This became affected and he has since a 5 a 511E111 @1181’! tho lllillltlﬂ had mettee, uuth "Hunt It there i5 11° m: lererow granted that is‘ um m“. nan NEW YORK. Fob. 10—iCu n "~"""" ._ motion is in effect that this case suffered from blindness or partla! 51°1°11 "- 5118 °1 110111‘. 511d 111111 111 such evtdeheu 0t 111_‘vi1l there ,5 he 11°15! ‘V010 littered 0n a privileged vrerri-‘wrlil-iiuiini luli-uul-cu ivrrc ,u,,‘u',"e,;,"" ' " ' should be wm-ldmwn from the jury hhhdhess thereby certain circumstances mid colldi- question about the with e bet 1000581011. and there ivac no actual C- Burke 54 55 l“ -ril _'th,i': . "",,">'-~ -- _ ‘ ' . , - "cc ii’ . , , ', Qhullli aldrhn; rufhiflliiiu “Qlllllilulflll {'“1' ',,'"' and decided by tile Court, because (b) During the winter of 1929 the 110115 1W1 11110101‘ 501110 uualifivﬂtiilns. rhbsolulc t’ 111-11100 F110 01d" is that lildemclit Ralph ""“1““-‘ ~ 82 B‘ l“ 311552,,“ 7e1:"e,‘,1,911"' "1"!" 5'1“ "M .21" r-(r-[L ',' it is to be determined upon ques- plaintiff entered thc defendant's 11111‘ 11° 1111“ 511°1- 1111115911. ‘ New this t . . t, . . ,_ 111" 9111011101 101‘ illc defendant. and J‘ D 1x11111115 ~ 113 7“ 161 _ .4 cents (United Staten . _ _ u , _ . 10\V@\5‘1- 50 iii 11-5 “it , . w A Jhttktn w) ___ 90 "uuuuu, ht 2,, Mu ueueeut, utter m,“ 01-15% 1 than 100k into that shop whhe the detehehththwae tehu Now, Mi. Daey lids a melnbel of have gone, is e ease ht heath-ted l0u._8ent.lemeil. are discharged from l . . s . . 333:1? ‘is’: vii; i??? .l-'§i"'l.'ir§.'§""§.'§ 11101-1011; _ _ licrcrily absent from the front DBYl- 111° C“? C°““°"~ T11“ C111’ °°““°11- privilege, not an absolute privilege, “w” °“ m“ 1"”? 1”" n” W15‘ I‘ Mdmm‘ 7"’ " 75 the?‘ iii-m folr cuhlcae e e If this motion is granted. then of the shop, and unlawfully carried 1111113118115 11111" ‘1111-195- 11115 111° 0011- because that hrivhege t5 qualiﬁed by Charged 5mm 19119 C0111‘? c I . :~. :i , - - . i- .- utettwulmthl: efeleigy": u; teefleee _ you will be free from any further away a bag of flour belonging to 1191 0V5? Veictoliile P611» 1111111181110 the duty et- the hereon eth-tmthg he ‘e e‘ e e dny Wit! 84.42%. c —--—— duty, free from the bringing in of a. the defendant. The latter, on dls- WW" ° E1¢1111°1 T911156 11°111115§1°11 to speak “qthout mat-m’ to say o,- ' v ‘ ‘ ‘* “ “Me: ~ e rc-e , ' (‘T-Indian I've“) verdict at all and the finding will eoverin the ﬂour had been carried 15° a 9915i)" °1‘ P9150115 10 Oiwrdl/c 8 ~ ~ ' ' a _ _ q-gggyqo 1m,’ m___ ' F . do what the does without malice, and 5w,“ -‘ m", have to be by the Court without the away, unlawfully sent his son to get lrlllt stand or restaurant there he muse be able so e) satiety me g E A 0| - i _ Tl ‘ ' - . " . ' Montreal 22f3.:§.;‘2:..’,“'.f.". i“‘:.f1?.i2§§..i“ 13.31:“...Ti§..i?£§“£?;“.i..:22.;$. 212.1553. 5,11» I; ijjdf," 51;? ..-...2;"i:'...f“;."“;.". and "Z55"? "1" . 1- - i ' 1c case soneo qualle prv- . ' ‘ r '. ‘ “"1111” and it is well that intelligent jury- him willie carrying the flour a short 191111111“ 11131- 11"! 11111111111911 1111 111111- - I Menu‘ 2°‘ p" "ma; Clmmﬂl- 26- Der word: In Melnoriam I t ., - ~ _ cgc, the plaintiff must then satisfy i . _ S M ar k et Arr-n‘; _ men should have some conception of distance from the defendant's shop, T1105" 1011111116- i1’ 111111110. and the judge thut thete ,5 etytdehee of ‘ elf: lumh’ Lists °l_ FM“ “"1 sjﬂ-"m-‘ll 013"" ‘$11191’ -- Just what it means. Essentially, it brought it back to the defendant "W" 119°" 1111 11"P1'1"11°3°d °°°a' malice on {he part of the defendant per ‘lnch- blotter; olfulillelhnﬁm i§li°°"-lll°'m“'l.7.°§ agulnnr '- 8 0h, c. PG!’ C nu", m.“ _ is a. division aioiig the lines I have and reported to him that the plain- 5111111 W°111d 11111"? 119911 51E11¢1BF°US teigo to the jury 1g me 913mm! 0r 40 Der word. Other rates on applications. ' “out” ‘""f""" 1""'1 1,11}; fiefyilﬂijf indicated, leaving cases that are no admitted to the defendant's son Mid all 8611011 wuld have been Suc- has eh“, m, such mdeumu ,t ,5 the eeelttgluimum Chdrsc for my udwﬁiscmcn- twenty - the grltlllllteritt. A properly tryzlble by the jury-that that the yﬂalntifl‘ had stolen the 6955511113’ 11101131111 811d DFOSCCIIl-cd- duty et the Judge to eeeeeu e t/ct” l D Blvmiillln 15' 1nv°lvi1lg 111111911111 111195110115 °l 11°11“ bull Mr" Pays P19103110" 1s 1h“ he dict for the defendant. If he has n+oooooooow+oo4ooooooo vooooooow-ow-oomoooooo-o‘; gar: fact-leaving them where they were 3. In the alternative, ilie defend- W115 Blleilklllg 111 11110 11110 1111115 dill-Y- give“ hm, evidence 0t hum“. Smith RATE 2 were eee m _ . . . , . . - - ;_ ,, ,- g, _ Cf“ m, A, before, but in other cases assigning ant says that i! he spoke oi- publlgh- As a City Councillor it has ills duty Idem to so te the jute.’ the“ it is a new)“ ‘or eeiw ﬂee l.‘ e I u Miscellaneous {rum Bridge .. .. them definitely to the Court. As I ed any of the words complained o1‘ t0 protect and guard the property (lueehon for the Jury whether the payee] in es D o we. s rc y 1 ism-l l c i n - - . - - ' e a vance. '-*'——'*—'- “- ,,,°,'"uu,u_, '{'_‘f f" ("tumult have 551d, if r fuicl at the present iwhich he denies) they were spoken and iniclcsis of tlic vubiic. 0t ihc defendant w,“ U, was not actual“, to,“ ALFRED Mehouhu) Pa“ .\lc(‘nll lcrnui . .. _ Hnilirlrrrl‘ 7,- time that fills is a matter that and published by the defendant in people of Charlottetown, and if in by a malicious motive in speaking "T_"j ------ -**-~—-- vtheta, Land Surueeuur. Hérmhm §gf",§fe1u,‘f'f‘_“'_ -- 1,11; titigfpejisﬂi gt‘; should ‘be tried by the Court, your the bona fide discharge of his du- that 1105111011 11c made sialcmcnts the ,,.,,,,,,, I; the mdence uurdut. lior bale vlilc, (R. s, Souris.) Quebec rcwci- 13 llurcnian an duties in this case will be done, ties as a City Councillor without; which were made in the public in- ed ,5 equuhy consistent ‘utth etthet, _______ ’“"‘“'1"'11"" "15 “"1" 111 without filldin a. verdict Other- any malice towards the plaintiff wrest and in pursuance of his duty ~ CARBOARD SUITABLE FOB T l4!“ H‘ wi e if the degision is against this and in the honest belief that what 11nd mﬂdl! them t0 1.11088 W110 Weld the existence of “lance or the mn- “mng mmmuses “l” 1° P“ o Let W Wi- I ' '° 1"» 5 - ‘ _ existence of malice. if it is dvubtflil. sheer Guudm; 0mg. t; ~i_ y» re-e ' _ . _ N seq/s motion-if’ the finding is that the he said was true and the said cvqrdg interested in the same matter, then etnuuy hanging h, the bateuee. the ' To LET _ RooM5_ APPLY EIX l'"""‘"i~ t me be not withdrew“ mu, the Wm Simke" ‘"111 11111111511" "l 1*" a 1"“”1°‘° “mm “l” ‘md- a1‘ Judse uhculd stcll the case, for ihcrc role SALE - AUCTION FORTY- G“‘“‘“““~ °°3°'2'1°'31' l 1 illlrllrilﬂraldlsln R WWW“ Wm Proceed m the wdm‘ 911) 1:0 1111? 551d MBYO!‘ 11nd 91W 111N151‘ 111° Wmds “"31" otherwlse is nothing to rebut the resumption Five, Bridge and Whist Score _'_' ~‘l'—""i~“"—‘ ' “TY W“? Colmcnbrs- W1“) had °°1"°5P°“d1n3 be slmdermls’ that puma“ “mud which has arisen iii favour of the Cards- 5111111111111 39111131 Job 58185111811 WﬂHlICd . {tftfﬂféiﬂter Let us see lust where we stand in interest and duty in the matter. be cnlmbie of sufcsuardina him from deteudent 0,, e pmuteged “cash-m PPWRPY- Ndv- l-tf- _______i___i__ (C'"""""" rm” ilrin’ Hail . this regard. The occasion is therefore privileged. ii Dlilscvlltloll f0!‘ Sllivlldcl‘. even 81- ML Day, the defendant, was ' 1x15)»; WANTED 1:93, RAWLEIGH e .\ll).\"l‘ltI-3.\I._ Frh. 10; tliritiiair 12!] §{21‘:1Q,u-‘-u-u The statement of tile case and of Now, that is the statement of tiwllsh the Words he spoke were un- speaking hum ht, utuee u, the Fglieﬁsliieeg]igylfgeﬁgelmeggg; hoiitlcs of 800 Coilsunlers. Reliable ~ 4'1 i i . - . - - . . r ~i - .ii .’ ‘.25 ($311:Ettfhzufilthﬂm"euffhftuf? u," m, .. the dcfcmetlle pleadings, are short, claim and the statement of defence. true. and eicn although they “ere ceuhet, as u tuuuueged hereon He Prenumn horse‘ Never wee beaten s Xhreeeeescterriiitieeleljly‘ Royeltitlltrink hi (Jllnndtl, clear-d todily ‘uewtm; " mid I’ P109050 10 101d 10 11°11 "10 List iii/chins. after the evidence was slanderous end lmuriour, except for uuoute lose that privilege if he spoke at any horse show. l-lcnry Wood, “huh; ,uuued,u,e,_,,_ Rah-high Co, “’A,_£,‘,,,,'i‘,‘,,’:,"ueuu h," . statement of claim and ﬁle state- closed, My. Bcntleyhfoi" the defend- this protection. he could writ]? 111111? Mth mullet,’ wtth actual meme’ Vernon River. 8064-2-11-31. Deuh C News’ htehtreeh chm eeAllitrtllllll pttrliind .0. ‘e ‘unrtu mu" ant, made this motion: That it be cloak around him and it would pro- with “huh, h uuuut he sum wee aria, rrl I nor. - _ ._ _ - __ _ '_ , L v _....-.g.__ hfffuuuﬂ, 'u°u'u_,u"l’§'uut '1 ‘(trim iglltiny . . declared that the words were utter tect him from attack that cloak of luaucmuety Sate‘ otheuwtse there F I H l W t d R W Feb 3 4 l0 l1 l7 18 4 “"1" .'"11"“1“ -‘”""-'~ i~e'l"<~ui.r '.'.'. .'.. i N Y B cd on a privileged occasion. that liriviiccc- is no nlaiiee. 'l‘hut Cull be uhuiica ema e e p a" e . lletlfettltgllétlguxzege Veuuu tziunrlr-r 275 e o 0 there was no actual malice, and that But the privilege is not illi nbso- t“ reduetton et- hte. putuhugu_ uumt ANTED EX e H "m-c N19“ \vdn[ed crn-iuuicruidu cruwn .0350. eufuufu, ' ,2", the case bc therefore withdrawn lute nriviicsc- It is what is called the ,,.,,,.ds em shone ,5 m, mums, one Whee-eeepggltelflle-esll: T111111," ——~--~————————-i—-—-—— n k k . A2311. ' " ————— _ . u . ,- i. _ , - - in .\' . -. _ . ut“u't‘r]'lfu't,ulfl‘l'rfr1_u,aue ilueitleultreiuia e101 (eemenen ere") flom. the lury. _ _ a qualified piliilegc. and it u, muuee t, uu the defendants Geeeueee mueutuue science lluiillswlouu MEN __r0 Frauen frflilti‘ eoimle "gum", w, “Mk, It appears that at this Council only protects ‘him iii the absence of View e, the tuets Strung weres wem ,_______ elezi? éuesyoieieerﬁetilrieieeet ti _- i-i-illlinr . L‘ .v , -~ ‘- l.... - . , __ , _ ' v _ v e , .. _ i. ‘ nfurllullmlllrililil. _,....u..i t. l Quit-ﬂu", u,“ ,§'.','.‘..'.. ‘st-ll’ fume neeeee M!’ Reunion, R 111mb”? “f man” n M“ my ‘med “h” h” lllStlflOd, (if it “'21s the defendants WOMEN WANTED r0 sew FOR m0 Cauuduu, Pmeuus; Te-ue, drum-c rirul-iunu 001;. huu‘ ‘hnmuyl 77 M, ,, ,,,,,,' H, the Council, moved that mi appiica- did. if wllni: he did and what he duty to uehtuteet. the stetehueht,’ us at home. Sewing nilil-liiilcs httteles’ Meeteihm teed uhd ",‘,’,T,',‘,‘,.,,"§.}h_ _ yjyeitiluuc ' tion nillde by the plaintiff for leave said represented nctuiii ma‘iee it te. uh etudeuee u, muhee ca?‘ Séelellilﬁbelftﬁiliig? fal-lii products. ‘Sure sale ‘IITOVCTY Illllill rupcc .2120. 1.:f_k'“,',‘u ',‘,;,e"‘ 1H5 Imp (iii , to operate a restaurant in Victoria springing from a malicious feeling And here the rule gees Very th,._ T‘ t 1’ 1" ' ' 11011101 B1B lllilillﬁ- FEW WYYHOHBS Iluly ilrc J11!" irhlunm (‘in 7 1'11 1"“° - 1 ' Park be granted Now you will re- and intent then that privilege l oron o‘ 51111 °P°11~ R°5"1'1'0 °11° 1111111911‘ '7"‘1“"‘ 1°" p’ 'l‘nu--i uuic iii Nilur llml ' ' ' ' ' Eve" 11 the slmcment mad” 15 lately. Ask details and catalog. eletlfzirsvlllvln rllllrlr mutt," e1 r H-itelee It: m I e s," 0,, hut member the plaintiff had amost un- would not protect. Now, malice in hmueh te he uuttue‘ that ts he e,.t_ Want d Iuemhee peeeuete 4785 Se Gene Jug 1 " "' ‘ tbﬂjunale injury u’ 11115 eycslght’ and 51m‘ 1‘ ca” 55 1111s h“ the cPmmnn dence of malice. But if the defond- _e orinc East. Montreal _ gulllliil rtolli . :ic u Willi. Allie [N it seems there had been a restaur- meaning or a bnd state of mind. It hut knew tt u.“ untrue thet would ‘VANTED e n“ we I o“ e‘ .\i, w. Wll. 7112-11‘. hi. i v .00", . ' A . , - ‘ ' , i - A . .-' __..._..__._.._____.._..___ ﬂgt‘llllll‘lnlt‘\rll‘ll'ilu[lllllllltl 4.1010. shzleguh" "l" m“ m opemuon m the Park {n has m‘? all“: quality or mcanmz as be Cﬂlltllislvc pYOOf (if malice. lh years 01¢ General p,,,-p,._,_.u,_ “m1: _ _ e 11'1"" 1"'">“‘" “1211- ‘mm iii-fir 011111140 °1 11 ""111 W111’ 111111 1°51 11"’ 11! “W011” “"1"11°10"0"- 1i 11w this case, if the defendant knew tcr Munn, a. n. s, Mermaid, Situations Vacant-P emale . _.‘,,‘,‘.,',",',§;‘,,,f‘,,’,°'}‘;_,;;j"f,;e,,,_ we aiclit- That deems to have susscsi- cdsc wci-c not clear.’ it might irc- ma, the Statement 1,, “m5 ma...“ 8061-2-11-31. _.~_» ~----_---- ' lluiic-I Siiiics dcilnr 1'0 iwrccnt ,,,,,,,,, 0,, ,,,,,u,,,<,~\~',::r§,{}=1',;1_,,";;1, .,, _ u,u_ 001 1110i that 00011111111011 8111111111181 uurntiy bullpen that the Court or was untrue, H1079 wqulﬂ he no ————*-'— —-—- .\.\IBITIOI'S ironies. riln my. mommn‘ I1 Mir-viii" (lulu-v ll\"\'I‘l\'l|Ii‘\l iu Wlllint. \b'flglllll‘zﬂ iuic Place miZllt b0 51111111116 101‘ the Judge might. ‘iul that it. ivas n» c -. chm“ but to ﬁnd mm entity m; WANTED—$ERVK'EABLE ELEC- Lin-cc cicnililici l'-l' Lidivs who c ,,\| ‘. . .. ‘ ' ‘ [.1 g_ 1:, __ t.,_ ..,._. '. . lfrwii-lil-‘r ilig"lv'r..lpifu"r 1T1.‘liKllriiI-lmiicilﬂduh? p1"1“““ l" ""5 °°"‘.‘°°"°"' Th” °”1°“ °“1"““"°‘1 1"1"11°§"' ‘"111 Y" liriviicsc docs not iw so 1" i“ l” ifrlicc "£12380 ‘Clirslrliolttélowﬁtnte glprrslsiilzpagllxln (‘gzillwwiﬁndiaggéllt (it||||,||||e||n\ "u, _..|,,,,,,,,.,,,,. nre\\‘hﬂ\|]t fro", am. plaintiff had canvassed Mr. Daythe would leave 1.0 zhc Jury the decision allow any persons to ulicr slandcra ' ' 8u32_.,_u_3, evstem bhueumeu ‘uuhted wt“, l xhul-‘gurrllil 3323333115‘; 58:19 iezefeeleglilil": tielhel: as totwheltehci- or nut that 1111:1155‘! against others. tu maki- statements 1i)!‘ tlnfvit-muieeinieie, Chair-rel Reggie’ uiiwu uy- 1i..'.i>i_noi> I icn hi. ihi -~-l<, B‘. ‘ was 0s ocai . .. _ _ ~-——-~-— cs, p. n icrne . G o L D N""“"1 " " “°"‘1'""‘" 111111‘ 8131131” l“: of such a restaurant to set a llcr- def d t - it!“ o .ma Ce t) e which he knows 7m mmm m5 Vlitillslflgil .\i.-l.c<ul nllil 9,763,000 v _i'ciir ugh. ' en an ' m m “e 0mm ° "'15 protective mantle iii such clise falls Male Hélp Wanted ' 5v;- ‘t 7 H nt_2a‘_-2_,t_]t_]8.25 Yurrhur Whmlt (‘IOIPII orley, iA-ix, uiulcl- yer- mission rather, to conduct that rea- pgint h, this ,,,,,i,¢,,1,,r use; Should away and tuuuue tum uxuuueu as any ______,_e_ _ l - - " ' '~ " :1"~‘,“'“" ' :‘»‘"'"~‘"‘ "t“"‘"» ",°'" ‘:]"°:‘"“I°4 i; ‘t’? taurant. and Mr Day appeared fav- the Judgg deride upon the point of erdhuury men “mud ‘he ‘to uhewer "ow To (apl- A GOVERNMENT _- -A--.----___~-._ ‘vii urn . owcr, on n llnclnllgo o rl a arc ' ‘ ' , k l . A k - Ylckcra llcvt-u, trtmi provision» 2 cents id a ourable and subsequently made a malice or leave it to the Jury? I am to the 1-,,“ consequence o; the words Job. Free Booklet. The M. C. C. POULTRY CCU U O . " s T o c K s Algomn _ _ (fnundllu Prell) 5115585111)“ as to other members o‘ “m3 1° “ﬂew Shwuy the 15W as, l-hﬂt he Md llﬁcd- Ltd" Totem; the u 1a 2,, -i-———————-———-—~~——-—-~~.- , jlllﬂllqtlll wlhhlpysil Feb. 10- ghe Qgungl] he might, 599, It, seem; 151d downth such aeuehethth, uh“, I em eetne ‘me “he “letter e‘ . . . - - - .. STUDY AT "oele 1e eeeee , 1'“ that Mr Day's son who had obaerv- 31th,, h t), - t, ‘ ‘ I. l _ 1; | 1 ., (‘Loan - i 11B 911111’ a" 11° wncemed some len tli, because I would like time and learn the bout liieihods i . Bought Sold H3191? T: '1" “u t_ u , Hutu J t l, _ e ed the plaintiﬁ talking matters over with the law. I would like that you the jurygto 1l11dg|$l4§nd that, a]- Otltarxreggcltle, gymeﬁe‘: of, hatching. raising chickens, i QUOtGCI - RBPOHBd 011 fl:g“t"e‘uf, '_ _' __ e muff“ ' ' "l ' ' " y 48",“ o“ with his father, intervened and sug- should have the opportunity of thqugh nil-y cannot. iiinkir use 0f it °°11Y5°~ “ulidreds °l s“°°°5$l“1 lillggllllffbillrﬁflllllt‘ all? llllbtlltlugglﬂnllh 1 . ~ . .. - -, . . n i. , _ ' _ - l o l - omen executed on e title-timele- __ ._,., ‘ eeitttlttee- Mill um. Jilly 326A. oct gestcd that this was the vman who hearing just what it is. because it in this case. Just how ilicii- office is grwui1l°seuervgi° _M€1°1' 311F111‘? mt, m, L Q s_ Doug“. ¢othee ,sll exchanges. (‘chair (‘on .. "41 Hurley: it... 291A: Jilly 25ml, Oct: 111111 50ml» time before stern i1 has seems a pity that iii-any circum- ggccled, and how i... their position ° m" §"',',"11v§"'1.,,"§,1,1t'“t§' makes you n trained multrzecx- 1 1~ l 1W1" 555- [fl l’ M.D ' h .That w - _ - , _, . ‘ ' ' ' '- , - _ < "a321,, ,_ l . t°e ourelmm r eayeies l}; M” 31am” a 1"" “1’p““muy 3° cm“ ln general mdiicis stands ullafiect- __._ __....___. llleuerelewltlreid chaiviegteste "u", m" , (Xhlll "cu-m; n Olinla OI! 31111116 l: l'- b); potent and intelligent should not cd, Lost lot Intgrnational Corrcsphlidencc I liliii r , ' .. . .». - Klrkoiiiirlli Win-m: w“ n‘ to, e a m“ ewean b’ used 1") mm 11111981‘ capaclty- NOW U10 1111‘ ~~-1i-"1 "1 111-111" 111' 11° , ________. Schools. Canadian. LllllllCd, Dc- Kiiek Qti-iiu Quit; " , 111% lllllllﬁﬂ ll"! ‘ll-lit t0 M1" DRY and I would vcri" much rather if “mm-u is {or 1hr- _|l|l‘_\‘." l aili rcad- Lou‘. BETuuuhu FA“, ROY“ pai-tmciit Z, Montreal. Canada. . , , r ll A : . . , . . - — l r l 1- - tenet» em] tee: _ I d" e when Mr. Day was sympathetic and the case \\(‘l‘(‘ LlPHl—-Bny judge i“; “ow from ~~0<lgci~5 (Jll Libel and ty um, Churtuttetewu huh. boy-s P. Fcby. 1i. Pl: 130B ‘I U 8mm “M. ‘ilk: :10 f i \ m a dm-"m a In" one an" heaﬂng ‘MM’ h“ wm-lld Dfi-‘lcf-l-llilt the burden of slander" h standard liuiiioriti’. “But skates mid boots slzolsik Find“? one m- a p r u- . .~ : . n llll-un ,' _ , _, ‘ ‘ “ ‘ " ‘ " " " cnhnhoﬂhrotu" uffefut, _ u", M, 2 ,; w 2ft“: N" u t, w 5°11 118d l0 "Y. whim that Symlmmy deciding upoii llll. iclcict should be more is nlvrnys illi‘ prior question, please notify Guardian. 8085-11 Peg-Song] _ lttilmuo ﬁzz-edge"? llugecfiieﬂ : No 2 mu 10%; 115d dhﬂﬂtied- put upon the Jury. ' h, time ,,,-_,. Nmmwe or malice u, ———— ———< ._.__ 3' nlmlu- m- M""‘"" - nviifiihiulul niriry. lruiiiucnircrlg-“il rnvr x a Wm" 11“ °"‘°°‘“‘° "1’ "m" m‘ 1 1m twill"! "0111 0 rdcilsnizcd go to the jury? And this is for the LOST-SET 0F FRONT BUMP- PRIVATE KINDERGARTENS Mamba H ll! took E hill ~ ' ' "i. "1 l! 5 1° I" s» Room r‘ iv liliii: 2 row er a c w ,1, , Council at the regular Councllmaet- gughoﬂty 0,, m, m, o; w,“ tueee The uuueumuheu h, teueut. ers oft Chev. car, between Char~ pgy, Advice given free by- the Montreal Curb Market. gm] (‘nnfilﬂt . Other crudely no t1 C W 211i: N» 4 ing‘ on the motion of Mr Reunion v ' ' ' - 1015810111111 811d P/llllvlﬂiv- Finder Canadian Kindergarten Institute ‘e we edleletile--- - e 0W 28%: N» a e w thee’ en e u“ e Bmmond on Torts, p. i528, See. 141ml the defendant arising from the . the“ hetth, w A m‘, “up (Toronto m) ' r - -a c “p; . ~ - - - °° "' "' ‘“ ' " ' W ° 9mm“ Th! 110611010 Nldl- privileged occasion remains till it “m, ‘v9, . 3911441.; gum‘; 34,114..‘