[(575323 56”” PM 153. 5 yet another point, this time the one made by "Concerned Reader".

From our interpretation, (at least) I the latter

reasoned that any individ-

iial who would intentionally "

destroy the new life brought about by his/her actions could not have much respect-let alone love-for his/her sexual partner. 'Ihe act could not possibly have been committed in a spirit of loving and mutual self- giving, if the individuals involved reject the product of the act-a new‘person, genetically formed from each of them. In other words, how can a woman love a man, yet consent

to kill ' ‘thechild he sired? —:-']his is what we derived from the let- ter of "Concerned Reader".

Finally,we would like to take two statements of Professor Gifford , and question their benefit to his argument. He states "Simply because something has been done for some time does not make it de- sirable." We couldn't agree more. Abortion has been going on for some time, as has widespread promiscuity; that does not make them "desirable" or even right.

And for the grand finale: "Why should seals suffer because of human unerployment?" We only ask, "Why should unborn children suffer because of world "over-population", or because of human lack of restraint over "natural desires?"

We live in a society that says "If it feels good, do it", and "If it gets in the way, get rid of it. " Strange that pro- ponents of this philosophy fail to see that they themselves stand to lose in the long run.

Sincerely, Valerie IVbore Marsha Gaudet

Dear Editor,

I am writing in response to a letter which appeared in the "letters to the ed- itor" section in the last edition of your paper. 'Ihe letter I am referring to was written by Prof. Gif- ford of the Psychology Dept.

Prof. Gifford begins by freely criticizing the ' abortion article written by authors Gaudet and Moore. . II‘his appears to be his main » intent until I discovered that in the second para— graph Prof. Gifford has decided to comment on the hypocrisy of the Catholic Women's League in Soutl'lPOrt as well. Being sanewhat

confused I read on only to discover, to my amazement, that Prof. Gifford has included another letter to his all-en I ssing criti- cal analysis, this one ap- parently written by a "con- cerned reader. " In the course of his collective criticism Prof. Gifford also manages to include contents on such diverse topics as merployment, the creation of a viable syn- thstic fur industry in N‘ELD repression of the adult human being's normal desire for sex, and a curious Old- time NFID sport entitled "let's Go Shoot Sate Beo— thuks. "

Being totally unfamiliar with this method of argu— mentation, I will confine my cements to the begin- ing of Prof. Giffords let- ter which concerned, I believe, his concern with the use of what he felt was "emotiqnalist propagan ." I might point out that the deliberate termination of human life (frequently cal— led murder) is an erotional issue. Human beings not only "thirnk" they "feel" as well, some moreso than others, I might add. When tlne human life being term-

inated is that of a defence--

less unborn child, the res response to such an action is "naturally" emontional as well as cognitive as both are necessary components of any stable and mature in- dividual.

Concerning the peices en—

The WUPEI SUN, Thursday, April‘ 6, 19278, page i

titled "Diary of an Unborn Child" and the' "Balland of the Unborn" which accom- panied the abortion article in question, these are works of art which serve to express the very real human potential of an unborn child, something which is undeniably existant but often overlooked. I am sure Prof. Gifford is cap- able of much clearer thinking than fllat which is demonstrated in his letter.

Respectfully, Kerry G . Moore

Dear Editor,

'Ihis is just a note of appreciation both to the authors and to your news- paper for the excellent and though provaking article on abortion which was featured in the SUN.

How can any compassionate human being even consider the injustice of the seal hunt and remain aloof from the ceaseless slaughter of human infants?

It is time for each of us to set his priorities i inorderandtotakeas‘tand on the real delimmas that

confront contemporary society.

let us not pretend to show our charity and concern by feigning to be appalled at

such a comparatively insign—-

ificant issue as the seal hunt. Save our energies for demonstrations and appeals against the deadliest atracity we are faced with

year.

last weekend in May

Student Union overseers .

next year.

'1

RUMOR HATH IT

There was no one at the General'IVeeting on Wednesday because someone forgot to put up the notices. 'Jhe Great Flood of 78 has started.

last weeks Pig & Whistle was the last one of the

The Student Union has paid of $45,000 in past debts and now own the Barn completely

'Jlne yearbook staff is once again having problems. The Athletic Awards night is next Wednesday.

'Ihere will be no more movies on Sunday night

People intrested in working on ,Orientation 78 should leave their names at the Student Union Office. The Education Society are going on ‘a canoe trip the

Final exams start in two weeks

This is the last SUN of 77-78 All student Union positions are open for next year.

The Campus Police are completely fed-up with their The Personal Board still needs two male members for Pres. Baker is retiring his position ‘

.'Ihere may possibly be one more edition of the 1978 SUN. (in the middle of the summer)

today-the murder of innocent

unborn human beings! Sincerely Keith Kennific

Dear Director , I

How do you do?

I shall appreciate it very much if you would give your valuable time' little to my request.

Well. . .I like your country very very much, especially Prince Edward Island. And I've been desiring for a long time to get some contact with sure people in your island to correspond with. But I did not know how to do it. Recently, however, I've learned that best way is to write directly to your university. So here I am.

Well, I am going to tell you something about myself. My name is Keiko [Vbchida and I am a Japanese girl. My hobbies are reading, painting and travelling. In sports, I like swimm- ing and basketball. Of course I really want to correspond with a girl or boy in your island.

Don't you think it's a good idea if we could understand each other by exchanging some stamps, cards, and news or informations about our school friends, daily activities, and even world events!?!?

I love scenery of your country, and travelling around your country is my dream. Well, it might be too much to ask you but if you can introduce someone in your university to me, or if you can put my letter in

‘ school papers, I would

be so pleased! 'Ihank you very much! Yours very truly, Keiko Mochida.

An introduction card, complete with a dainty leaf in true Japanese style, was inclosed with the following inform— ation:

INTRODUCTION CARD

Name: Keiko Mochida Address: 630 Okanomiya Numazu City Shizuoka 410 JAPAN Age: 18 Sex: Female Hobby: Reading, Painting, Travelling, and Collecting dolls and postcards. Sports: Basketball and Summing.