The Irresistabie “

FRINGE EDWARD TO-DAY

IT ” Girl

Gunman‘; Gal! Red headed. dynamic. nbsurbilbg‘ Clara Qiw in this flaming drama of dire realities! Bavealnl, for the first time, the lives 0f that "other half" of ivoriiiriliood . . . . the women beyond the barrier oi‘ the law, the sweethearts oi hunted men.

ORCHESTRA-COMEDY

-~ \

T , PROVINCIAL

Coniiniied from page l

_.. tiiiit iic was iili‘.‘.\Iii"ii|.(2(l. I zis/h. - , "' , cs1 finally riiat he was Sliil€flilgfiUill ‘PM m” 11")“ some .801“. of IICYVOil-v disease. But to j i‘ iii manivouid ‘l’

thecrdizi 0'03.

could ‘oc cierilt wiiii. I

_ dealing with the iaoim fido belief 0i 3

filfio main who laid the information.

‘ Jvaytiirii aypcrsvr z-liablts might ti‘.

lne is lritcricrl-iig wmi the picnic

, any wiry, tiicn let him be taken u‘.

~+

at Em our

» OPTIQALIJ SERVICE

iflCAlli-liililfitl ' , 4 . new. WORK.

7 0o Your

He's Inn expert when It comes t»

l‘ iitwoiir snri- e nil the time.

0n! st of Pni ts. Brushes flllll‘. nil - Viagra; Huh Ilsa are Iflnv ~ (or '

Kit;

and D y getting your

l ts‘

Tlee

v v

Oar Prices ' Iirlt.

end 1»i-i=~:c~..ied. But it seems to me thin uiL; L wiuii is unnecsssargv and

ieiiowgot flail and created a distur- bance, and no inspectors were there

INTENSE

LOVE and

DARING ‘ D E E D S l

Thrills of o, sort that you never

—L0vo that is S] strong as death —

Jealousy as des-

tructive as fire and drama. that in o v e s swiftly.

have‘ n erpcrienc- , - ed - Romance ' with a new twist n

“WEDDED BLISTIRS"

. . s "~11!

ti, In

the Plebiscite in favor of Govern-

ment Control? We ought to known! beoaule if we keep on adtflng sections every year the people will not know‘ what is really the law. -

I Suggestion From Opposition l

I l Mr. Saunders Becomes Jocular l, i Mr. W. C. S. McLure: With refer- ence to this clause, Mr. Chairman, the great difficulty seems to be that no one tins yet given us any idea o! what "lilEDXlC8Il0ll" is. If the pro-i motcr of this bill

Usual Prices

-

throughout the

You'll love it too!

WaQTnir-g. _

Youth and age hare their hearts in this Slllflfb 5""?- 5 smashing hit in New Yflfk Bl"! _

country.

A picture the whole family will en joy,

told!

and lie should iiavé stars for that in- _

swqariious about people drinking — 10f Midizm“ mm if‘ “at bond fig.“ of

(my, 1:, i. Lkviy ro lrnci itself to n great d iii oi muse. ‘rake the class

vim \- iris a.» get. somebody

All he need do is

ifti

and nothing could be done. ‘féilpws were made an example of they wouldnt do it again. I think there is merit in the clause.

If these

" , word in some way it might help us. Dr‘ Mummzmtnae reaso: I my] Premier Saunders: When he gets 196364 W“ fill! ‘t’: Pugs? 0;: § on the ground and catches the Brass witnefielagzzgnxsgidea-no. er. i t ‘and w“ m prom

gappcrir to be stougerimfcn thcstrcet. ‘drunk. Ii-z rsns c mum. respectable ‘n? ‘j-mi“ A N”? * tizeii, bu: be‘ could easily be izikeii i“ “mild b5‘ a q

J hm)“, a Gufw, on‘ the balm ‘m? Lbc 1.22mi lwiorc tiic POHAIC li/iagiatratc hefiefbr an mfmnaht '“.hn had 5.3m l unri (’i1lIl["Z11l3(l to answer. Ii it were him in that condition. I am leaving: 1“CC‘°"’~"“'~" m 111'?“ i“ . _ V out “Home, Yaspéf. O,- me ca... U‘... ‘llc I wiulri mi riijcct to it rit all, but , for the man who gels drunk on the am ‘I do 11o: Till ' '

, iThltxrésuxp-‘vouxd by...’ Subject a re_ strong as icr 2.: it gocs, but he was ‘fidmmfi citizen room, indignity of iivicrriizg t.» an iinpres on. _ bit-ling brought up io the Policcl fl"- 57: ' ‘ _C:iiirt and iroinncligdvto nn-tvfcr to xi h“ ‘U i” charge oi drimizennterzs. And that is i ‘o ‘gho; an uncommon QGnd-MQIL very bwculdnt swear you beiicvcd thorium lmaiiifpeoplc-have nervous disorders "m8 1“'*°*"l°°ted- ‘l 4' ‘wiilcliscaiisi- ll'.'.‘I!l To “will: in illiCh c. "1"" ‘ha? mm“? 1°“ vi mi: linovsiiig iilPil f; llicgv were tinder. Lznesiiiiiaenee of iitgiror. 1r a man is_ i ‘committing a breouch ‘of the law, ii _ " h, ~.v/licrr-bj,' anyoiic c111 tcstiiy if a mun

t

.

t

.1 I i311: memo unessns

" $ b _.i_igii§li=rr_'i§5u. GlVK-ZN T0

‘ iii": of rum

i “handy Andy”_ , I ‘L, said is consistent.

‘!:'*'iii~i"'.iifi.raigit ‘Lg-l’: lit-tr.‘ . ‘l likfltu ‘%"J$ iivnl '—-1qi\’h'e'n . ,

3 iBedeque says, W0 flnd it in e. great l l

liion. Mr. Stewart: The case my hon. friend cites at Wellington could be ioiien care oi b; cm Criminal rcgard lo rinoilicr bill. it b; quite oas- Gode, for creating e. disturbance. ‘mic rmn to ivhom Where t-he drinking results in any at i. dignity may ‘ dlstmbance. the law as it stands cov- n. it quite sufltiently ii‘ it is taken advantage oi’. I believe thoroughly in that. I have no sympathy at all

"o (l stalcinciit on octli. As my l. friend from Rant-loo said with

‘ "cats oi the pub- .. 191M891’- or anywhere else and makes a hi: viiim. llic icad- l disturbance and becomes a. nuisance oi the ODDUSiLlOll says is very to 306d citizens. Whit I am rs- ‘foffkig to was not the men who gets drunk but the man m. tlphrouih some infirmity. may be smpeetied of being drink.

I suggest that this provision should be confined w the. ofliels. The oi- iioers shnsivd by the tulips!!!)timot- any private-citizen. I think it should be modified at least u» s,» eietent. that the proceedings should be taken by an ofllcer d: the law.

in:

‘r1: 1-1:‘ CT-ll wcur lie be- ., ivbulfl. b. sutllciczit. Mr. ‘.1. at: Ilut you certainly

You might be un- I believe his . "y. ‘occause the prohibition , euuto: cannot bcprc- ‘sient every éro tiicrc drinking ‘going on. l-lcrc we have a clause‘

; fl l , |hus been under U16 influence 0i liq- Pmvhhn in c m n!‘ Co“

li.:.; bean creating a distur- iic can be brought up and evidence can be given. I think it is very important in the enforcement. oi our Ac‘. ihfit llii." clause should be put in. I hardly iliini: it will be ab- fuscd. Err-n ii w? lind men who would - tiiirb a fol-c oath. the person ngainsb‘ whom iii: iniorniciilcri ls laid ms the clmuirc- of vkifciidiiic: himself.

Dr. llaznliiiirii: Vliiat do you zxican by being; under the influence

Mr. A. F. Arsenault: I d0 not see the obmt of this amendment at all. Mr. Chairmen I believe that in the case o! any man who gets drunk and causes a ctbtiwiiance the law is luf- flclently sulngent. You eon pet him under the Criminll 0060. Ind l! is so drunk tantbehanqnnmeeho other people he eeztainh our be ar- rested. mi imagine the use where’ amanistraieliifionthenadihe or “quad, guests a or somebody and

Premier Saunders. When you come» may have m-l. “nub” o": .

it ilicre is iflilly no lilllls- “n” or n-flhh" '~ ii mati who unis a teddy Smeus a mink d ‘hw. 053th?’ '.ili_v and he i: n good, dc- l“ moy iccl like get- mt lie is a good, res- pcrtublc mun. and lie takes that ted- wifinvut any idea oi it in- ljiiiiii»: il_l'i‘*"‘.li', 1 ;.ir.ipl_v to trike his j liquor lion: - .-..-:i ink" ll to (iririk. If ~ that man is (imcovercd taking the teddy oi’ rum. he is liable to the pen- lilifv’. It seems to me that that man is no’. iicuriy 2s guilty as the man

get into tisislususnsgt, lndoneaei crises tlieotbsljlfllillilli“: causcheistflillflhuliefl’. ‘fill liegoestotownandawealsthotthh man was intoateatedonaotrteh dayandyouyutthat innocuous inthepeeigienthothehnllzt t0 eomatoOeurte-ndpuovehftlfl wassober. AQdhQWlQhQIBQW deft? xuiainitisavanmiow ;,. W _ proposition waonyeiiewo evevwvds (Z41: 3:21;. "or w » - -.».»- -.-=

on the street. That man ernla '11: ‘ . igpi on a _ d 1 - W0

made rm example 0!. " wll tall two lion. Mr. Stewart: Quite so. We all '1” _ ngrco on that. or itch"; ‘firi. o‘ w‘: l Premier Ssun’ : ! think thlt P9 “my l i r ‘what my hon. intend from ‘Bethune imkmh‘ ‘u wqu‘ n -~ t b. ‘ IdonotbeHeva-F-'9““f7'“~ ' *‘ . i . sold that such e nan had too maoh I ‘ that the ofiimrs will go beyond what _ d t M ‘ n“ “h” they think is right. 1r a men is not Holman s‘, ,1! ‘t M.‘ ‘b . ‘fliiijurlng anyone. ii he ls going along tom“. m“ 3:1 a n h . _quietiy. I doubt- very much if anyone Ia?“ o " I I l’

though he ls not ineunhflil- i; ‘-'

that in the fourth line the words "if? corroborated", or “on corroboration" be added. That would require more than one witness to make out a case. Mr. Wright: 1 think it is quite all right the way it l5. '

Mr. Angus MacPhee: 1 think it is the wish of the temperance people that this clause should be put in. The Government is not shoving it. Naturally enough we would like to legtlate according to the temperance people who know more about these things than you do. They made a Ysbudy of them. Oi course a person ‘Y not swear a man is drunk when he is not drunk. I think you are (getting rather suspicious of our peo- pie. I a» not thinlrthat this would t.‘ chimed; I hope not. 1r we find it is not working. it can be repealed. ‘flier-e is no doubt that when a man is in Hie habit of getting drunk there should be some means to round hini up and teach him e. lesson, because he ls a. nuisance.

Dr. Maobllion: That means that there is some outside body dictating to this Legislature? _

Mr. Maoflsee: Well, the Temper- ance people, naturally.

‘ Dr. Maelfliiari: They are dictating?

Mr. Malice: Yes.

Dr. fidfian: Very well. I am a temperance nan and my suggestion should have lust as much weight as any one else. (Applause). You are prepared to put inla seotlon which can be abused. and you are encour-

e" h. : Any section might be abs-Bed; but ii that is so we can it

in. llnollllian: There may be wqsfliQg in the statement o! my hen. Mini Bodeque. (m. wgum. but m remibv is quite

‘ . x a witness has evidence that one a disturbance in a place, that evjiienoe or infor- llllpvfl b0 submitted DOW b0 the

pruefifyén. and that information is as secret. - lamenting it so that he can be con- Ml W. . The evidence would not u up p80 Ne. Wrkhi: Not at present. This la inching it so that he can be con- HUNG. ‘I. “Eu!!! On 05b man's 0V1-

der i . Iaellue: Yes, or it might be

twoor% _. Is. y Hrhatiswhatlam

sling. Why don't you put in the

livould molest him or lay any infor- l I _ wnntinn. But as my hon. friend from P“ 5 “an.” m. . in d

lmany plnccs. In fact it was qnh e -».

few days ago that some Wellinden 2'.” u” “WM: to h” " c‘. l .’

‘r L U

" 14mins»; snag-nu a ofedinimvq

L i M w‘

that the tsatgimy ‘if corrob- faoie evid-

S’

"weniletetincto hisllqin. Iwaeappointedamm- we“ v tovfllarethis lfalmhandlvmnt

1i

thteinsbeennodiota-

,_ tmflatueailywewish I UN

m‘ wgmmm" Mr. MPLIIPBI If he is eating grass! i (Laughter). We know that there has ibeen a great difference of opinion ibetwcen imvyers and jurists on this rqucstlon. Last year there was a cnsc

lin London where two men were ill’-

rcsted. a Scotchman and a Jciv. A

police ofiiirer arrested them. and the» ‘next morning they came before Jhe: Magistrate. They were charged with. being intoxicated. Both of them

protested that iliey were not intoxi-

cated. The Magistrate then turned

to the officer who made the arrest

and said: “Are you sure these men‘, _were intoxicated?" "Vfiell," he said.

“they vrcrc acting strangely.” Tlint- was ull the definition he could give.‘ "How were they acting?" asked the‘: Magistrate. "Well," he said, "I saw! these tivu men on Picaciilly Square! The Scotchman was taking sever-i signs out of his pocket and throwing them on the street, and the Jew was I picking them up and giving them: buci: to him.” (Laughter). That was his only reason for believing them fol be intoxicated; and o! course the!

ier says that ii a man is on the ground, grovellxlg in the field and eating graas, he is drunk. Let us have some definition in the Act. The whole clause oceans to be ridiculous, when you place the evidence on the testimony of one men. He may have some ill feeling against leis neighbor, and he can no and swear that he was intealoabed. and that is auge- ieiit evidence to blieh a prime hole case.

Qovernmuit Bubs It 'Dan- mrons".

lion. Dr. Grant: I do not intend to go over this clause. but I agree with my hon. friend from Charlottetown that not many people in this Prov- lnee-perhaps not a man in this Pro- vince—can go on the stand imdswear that a man was drunk. I would say that this clause should be very care- “£601 rm- itinanee, napoleon Islaw in cliisreii one (by. Ivhapiithewudrunkbeoause when everybody lineelcd downhe remained stanflig up, pad he- __ to the too. But no oouldnt set down. because hehadansild-foemof epii ,u_iditjustetrankhim at this e. ‘There are many other rea- sons wliymon aotifiethin, andseme no think that ever-rm is drlmk my is etaflering or perhaps talking seamlessly. I tiim we should he very careful of this clause. too. bo- eauee some men will take a false oath. It is a dangerous‘ clause. I m not coma to oiwu it. but 1 would advice the inan behind it, and the Commission, to consider it eare- nily. ‘more is another thing about it: I think the Prohfittion low is all Yilhtbutifitcarrteaontheplebh- eiteihoysliouid not beooincon the It! the! do sometimes. For in- stpnls with Ntlld to first offenders. I ihhikthe prosecutor would do a

“Wild defim! U" Ispector like a school child. He should I

give him a iitill‘ for every conviction! ‘~ against a bail offender, but when he l ' can make a good citizen out 0i a man I 1 by going to the clergyman and get-Ir ‘ ting him put out of the business, for the first offence, I think he should get. two stars: and we woulcihavo a much better condition. There are

some people who are so much'cii-' thxisccl over this tlirr. they go too for. '

I want i0 repeat that I think the clause is one flint should be very carefully consicirrccl and ivatchcd.

A Yicutrni Proliibilionisi.’ ' i

Premier Saunderst- I move that the ‘ mill“ 99MB-

clausc as read be agnced to.

Dr. Mat-Milieu: I move that Jhd‘ '-

ciause be struck out. ' ' -

a k ‘ The onicndnirnt ivils ];ut""‘,5b,.. '- . “standing vole iind. was lost. all the‘.

Liberal members. with the exception of Hon. Mr.‘ McIntyre, supporting the Government resolution. Mr. hicln- tyre did not vote. _ .. ‘ _ Some minor amendments passed without discussion. . Clause l3 amends section 4'! of the Act by adding the following sub- section: i “(5) Any such ‘pl'§1Ctill0Il8l“m€!l~

Magistrate dmmsed me out Yougtioned in S\lb-SGCil(ll'i_ l of this Sec- mu“ put m“, m“ Act what youltion shnll be entitled to charge for “wan by "mwxwatlon" The Prank i each prescription under this Section

a sum not exceeding fifty cents."

Dr. MacMlllon: We have certainly a right to register an objection to this. W-iil the promoter tell me what is the object of it, or from whom this wonderful inspiration emanated? In theflrst place it is a serious reflec- tion on the medical profession.

Proirlcr Saunders: Will you make a rnotbn that it be struck out?

Dr. Machlilhn: I will. If you can't trust the doctors you hadbot- tcr not gore them any prescriptions.

Premier Saunders: I think I would support that myself.

D1. ltbcllfllan: Very well. I move that it -be struck out. and the matter- irtt to the judgment of the medical mcn. I think you can trust them.

lion. Mr. Mcbjyrei I-mhht say. for the lnionnatkxi of my hon. friend, that it has boon uie practice in the past for some doctors who have not very much practice to

clause ll put in them. We BIO

would do such a thins; infect I think most o! the dociorsflve any the for nothhs. I h only to guard against these who mte a buahieiis of eellirg prescription; am! charm: $.00.» Any doctor-sheet 1 know do not chemo at all; they give tliegi to their patients free,

Im- Mr- ltewarti Does my lion. friend the Minister at Public win preisnd to defend that action . and say that a man who wants Jiqgq- m the bona nde way is minty i1 bdrm" a Preemption? .

lion. Mr. minim: My noon-lens knows that it has been abused and thlt till’! hi" been. floater; in "WWW ~~'".1¢ My» w: um Pglqticetin any other way. ind who ti}!!! W0 or three dollars for a mfiflion. »

llen. Mr. MUM/allow" have a

lot new nod. it. when he Int in-

‘ ‘ oboutanrerolenee. he H tandtahdtotlienssiandpat hint out of buttoned-gather than-pt nisrosggmn u.» e competition. and I tlilik it iii had

ulyewd ma» mi. mu Ill of‘- ioiieeiaiderilie Letters domi- to

suggesting um the doctors manly‘

‘Tfielrl‘y" ‘ Pnrsned

Clause 14 amends section 131 oi r the Act by adding Eh’: following sub- I section: |

-"2a. Provided that where any person who is being freshly pur- sued by any such Inspector. Con- stable or Police Ommr onters or ~ takes IGYUQG in any building or , premises. such Inspectors. Consta-

ble m‘ rolicc Oillcer may, without "

obtaining a search warrant as in this Section provided. do and per- iorm any or all of such iwts as he »mlght lawfully do by virtue of any search warrant under this Section." Dr. Macliliiinri: I think if you ndd- l

‘red the words, “any female person": l whirls being freshly puluued it would i (Laughter). . The clause was adopted. l

. , I

‘i; ‘tfolibitlen Funds Prmcler Saunders then moved an‘. imendment to Sec. 181. which re- jetes-‘rto suiiplus. funds in the hands of the Prohibition Oomminion. The! section in the Act of i918. unchanged l last year, reads:

“The Bparcl shall also at any time iurnhh to the Provincial Treasurer such further informat- ion as he may re c. The Board shall also Q1 the 30th day of June

" and the 31st day of "-‘ inber in each year pay to the Provincial ‘ Treasurer the surplus money. if egg), over and above the spin of s , remaining on hand aitgr Qa- cliarging all expenses as of

and any further was and oliasgee ‘"5 W

Tectkilfteq by the Board under m;

The Premier read as follows: ‘"1119 300d shall -also at any time furnish to the Provincm